Technobabble of the Month

scene from Flash #225

Geoff Johns wins the coveted “Technobabble of the Month Award” with this panel from Flash #225 (pencils by Howard Porter).

“Spontaneous Conception via Time Travel.” Does this make sense to anyone?

It’s actually a contradictory statement: Spontaneous conception means a conception achieved naturally without any assistance (such as fertility drugs or IVF). I’m pretty sure that time travel would count as “assistance”.

(And does this mean that there’s a greater than average number of children in Central City, Keystone City, and Gallifrey?)

14 Responses to “ Technobabble of the Month ”

  1. Yes, ‘retroactive’ conception might have been a better way to put it.

  2. I’m of the mind now that it is better to just let the technobabble “flow over you and through you” when being exposed to it. Now that I’m in my mid 30s, any analysis of it makes my head hurty.

    However, if some writer were to make up some great technobabble about time/cervical dilation and birthing or somesuch then I’d have to tip my hat to such a thing.

  3. I think “spontaneous conception” was supposed to sound like “immaculate conception”.

  4. I haven’t read the story, but I suspect the assistance done without in this case was sperm. So presumably these are the hypertime babies that would have been conceived if Wally had remembered to bring Linda flowers on his way back from a JLA meeting nine months ago. Assuming that’s supposed to be Wally and Linda; I haven’t read Flash recently and with Porter you never can tell.

    Bill

  5. Nah, it’s spontaneous conception, like spontaneous combustion. Normally, one lights a match or applies friction in order to light a fire; in spontaneous combustion, something just bursts into flame for no reason. Likewise, normally one has to engage in intercourse or use artificial means to conceive; in this instance, eggs just got fertilized with no discernible cause. I suppose they can do paternity tests to determine who the dads really are.

    Of course, this should be a plotline for Superman rather than the Flash. After all, if his super-sperm are ever released into the wild, there’s a very good chance of them scattering and some ending up finding human female eggs, as Larry Niven pointed out so many years ago. Which is why it’s such a good thing his rural conservative foster parents taught young Clark about the dangers of self-abuse.

  6. Boy, that Doctor sure gets busy, doesn’t he?

  7. I thought it worked well in the context of the issue.

    Technobabble is just one of those things that we have to deal with.

    Consider this, if they broke it down and explained it in layman’s
    terms, how many pages would you have to read through?

    Give me good technobabble over 3 pages of explanation of something
    that just happened.

    puff

  8. It made sense to me, actually. Linda was pregnant, then lost the children. When Wally and Zoom went back in tome to that moment, Wally was able to protect Linda from the sonic boom that caused her to lose the kids. When he went back to his present (approximately when Linda was due to deliver, I presume, Linda was spontaneously pregnant again, history having been changed. It’s more of a metaphorical comment than an accurate description, but it works.

  9. Er, back in *time*, that is. And add a parenthesis after “presume” and before the comma. Oops.

  10. I think the scene made sense in the context of the comic. Linda regained the twins that she had lost. I can accept that, I even like that, I just thought the explanation was painful to read. Just call it the Speed Force and be done with it. Lose the technobabble.

  11. Hold on a sec - “if his super-sperm are ever released into the wild, there’s a very good chance of them scattering and some ending up finding human female eggs, as Larry Niven pointed out so many years ago”??? What the f-??? How could I miss this?!

  12. Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

    or vice versa…

    was the name of the article.

    You can probably find it online somewhere.

    puff

  13. Aine, Scott is referring to Larry Niven’s funniest essay, “Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex”. Niven himself has put it online here.

  14. Comment 8 makes perfect sense to me. That’s the movie “Frequency”. Comment 10 doesn’t quite.

Leave a Reply