The Great American Smokeout 2007
Filed under: Medicine
It’s the third Thursday in November, which means that it is once again time for the Great American Smokeout — or “The Great American Health Challenge” as the American Cancer Society seems to be calling it this year (warning: Flash-based site). Was the term “smokeout” felt to be too negative?
I encourage everyone who smokes to quit, for both their health and their pocket book. The “right to smoke” may or may not exist, and frankly, I have no interest in entering that debate. What does concern me are the increasing number of patients I’ve diagnosed with lung cancer and emphysema, the smokers who have an inordinately high rate of heart attacks and strokes, and the younger smokers who come in several times a year for recurrent bronchitis and sinusitis. There are newer and better treatment options available now, so I recommend talking to your doctor when you’re ready to quit.


I’ve decided not to pick on the pregnant woman this year (if you don’t know what I’m referring too, check out last year’s post), instead I’ll post this panel from the PSA Comic Spider-Man, Power-Man and Storm battle Smoke Screen. The prices are dated, but the point is still valid.

November 15th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
Random question: How do you get cervix cancer from smoking?
November 15th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
Prolonged chemical exposure probably.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:38 pm
Maybe, but it’s at exactly the wrong end of the body to be exposed to cigarette smoke, which is what made me wonder. Scott, do you know the reason that chart draws a correlation between smoking and cervix cancer?
November 15th, 2007 at 9:39 pm
In trying to keep kids from starting to smoke, lately I’ve been asking them why not; they routinely answer “it can cause cancer”. I really think Big Tobacco is writing DARE’s material– teenagers are immortal and cancer happens to other people, as everyone can point to old smokers without lung cancer. I tell them “It makes your breath and hair stink, stains your teeth and fingers, burns holes in your clothes, ages the skin of your face, and wastes money you could spend on _____ (fill in the blank)… THAT’S why not!
November 16th, 2007 at 1:38 am
Official Comment
Lurker,
Good question.
It has been noted in multiple studies that smokers have a statistically significant increase in cervical cancers over non-smokers. Second-hand smoke appears to be a risk as well. There is no clearly understood mechanism to explain this increase, and there may be some confounding factors (sexual habits, for example), but even studies that controlled for these factors showed higher rates of cervical cancer in smokers. (Cervical cancer is not the only one — you’ll notice that many of the cancers related to smoking are in organs that have no contact with smoke.)
Here’s an older CNN report on cervical cancer and smoking, and a newer New York Times one.
Leave a Reply
Contact Me
About
Subscribe:
The Best Of...
Special Topics
Archives
Categories
Twitter
Comic Blogs
Medical Blogs
Currently Reading
Arbitrarily Interesting Medical Condition
The Net:
Contents may have settled during shipping. Past results are no guarantee of future performance. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Void where prohibited by law. All rights reserved. Not valid with other offers or specials. Professional driver on a closed track. Your financial institution may impose other fees. All models are over 18 years of age. Employees must wash hands before returning to work. Results not typical. Many suitcases look alike. 18% gratuity added to tables of six or more.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
© 2004-2008 Polite Dissent. Powered by WordPress