A Matter of Rank
Filed under: Comics
If you’re writing and drawing a comic about the Army (even one as cynical as Army @ Love), it would be a good idea to get your rank insignia correct. In other words, if she’s a major, why is she wearing the double bars of a captain?

Scene from Army @ Love #3, script and pencils by Rick Veitch

I’m surprised how often this error shows up. I know that I’ve discussed insignia problems at least three times before in a variety of different comics. How hard is it to spend thirty seconds Googling to find the correct rank? Or look in an encyclopedia, or just ask someone who was in the military. This kind of mistake is hard to excuse because it’s so easy to get it right*.
For future reference, heres’ a little help: Officer rank insignia, and Enlisted rank insignia, straight from the United States Department of Defense.
*I’ll give Veitch a pass this time, over the quality of his past work. Just don’t let it happen again!
June 6th, 2007 at 10:48 am
I’m tempted to make a crack about anti-war leaning people not willing to research any facts, but where I actually haven’t read the book. I’ll give it a pass.
My fears about it being a reflexively military-bashing story was what kept me from reading the book. I felt it was going to make an argument about the military, using strawmen created in this piece of fiction. Given the odd premise of the book it could actually NOT have anything to do with contemporary debates about the military. But I wasn’t about to lay down money to find out. (Being far away from a comic shop browsing before buying is not an option)
So is the book any good beyond the insignia?
June 6th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Official Comment
I’ve enjoyed the book so far. It’s not stellar, but it’s comfortably above average. I don’t think it’s Veitch’s best work — but it definitely is his work, so if you’re not a Veitch fan, this is not the book for you.
It doesn’t come across as anti-military as much as anti-war and anti-people-who-run-the-war. Similarly to DMZ, it envisions war as corporate run. However, unlike DMZ, which has corporations more or less running the military campaign, Army @ Love has formerly civilian middle-managers (who were drafted) running the war as if it were a corporation. It’s also much more a satire — if not a farce — than DMZ.
Here’s an Army Times article about the book (hat tip to Journalista).
June 6th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
“I’m tempted to make a crack about anti-war leaning people not willing to research any facts….”
This does seem to be pretty much true as a general proposition. Facts about war and military life are a vector for Evil War Cooties created in a secret Halliburton lab, and thus must be avoided whenever possible.
June 7th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
I hate lazy artists. There’s no excuse, even before Mr. Goolge, to make mistakes like that. There are more books on military uniforms than most people would believe.
Of course, some professionals make that mistake as well. When I was in USCG aviation school as an enlisted non-rate (E-3), we were at MCAS Cherry Point to go through the pressure chamber. When we were walking to the PX later, dressed in our working blues with no insignia other than our USCG emblems on our ball caps, we were saluted numerous times by enlisted marines! I think our strange uniforms confused them and the nickel-sized USCG emblem could look a little like an oak leaf if you were already confused. I’ll tell ya, it sure felt weird, as an enlisted non-rate, to be saluted by coporals and sergeants.
June 8th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
Careful, Scott. Judging by angry threads I’ve seen on military-oriented boards about similar and far worse inaccuracies in portrayals of the military on film and TV, military mistakes in comics probably outnumber medical mistakes. :)
Leave a Reply
Contact Me
Subscribe:
The Best Of...
Special Topics
Archives
Categories
Arbitrarily Interesting Medical Condition
Twitter
Comic Blogs
Medical Blogs
Currently Reading
The Net:
Contents may have settled during shipping. Past results are no guarantee of future performance. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Void where prohibited by law. All rights reserved. Not valid with other offers or specials. Professional driver on a closed track. Your financial institution may impose other fees. All models are over 18 years of age. Employees must wash hands before returning to work. Results not typical. Many suitcases look alike. 18% gratuity added to tables of six or more.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
© 2004-2008 Polite Dissent. Powered by WordPress