The S.C.R.U.B.S. System
Filed under: Comics
As I’ve mentioned repeatedly in previous posts, I have been unimpressed by recent storylines in the Batman titles. Wouldn’t it be nice to know beforehand exactly how bad a particular story arc is going to be?
I hereby introduce S.C.R.U.B.S. (Scoring Concerning the Readabilty/Unreadabilty of Batman Storylines). It is a scoring system designed to give a quick determination of whether a particular Batman title storyline is going to be particularly bad. It is not designed to identify good storylines, just highlight the ones likely to be bad.
Scoring is easy, consisting of 4 areas of considerationsfor Basic SCRUBS (length of storyline, identity of Batman, side-kicks/guest stars and villains). Special modifiers are added in Advanced SCRUBS. The Basic SCRUBS score can be figured out from advance solicitations and no significant advance knowledge is needed. The Advanced system is more accurate, but requires more in-depth knowledge of the storyline. Once the Basic or Advanced score is determined, the Final Score table will show whether the storyline is worth reading. Scores are also comparable to one another: a storyline with a score of 14 is worse than one with a score of 7, and a storyline scoring 31 will be much worse than either of them.
|
|
|
Examples:
- In Knight Moves in Batman: Gotham Knights (#38-40), a 3-part storyline where Batman and the Huntress fight Checkmate before the Huntress ultimately agrees to join the organization. This would score 10 points: 3 points for number of issues, 2 points for the Huntress (as she was a major character ), and 5 points for her acting out of character.
- Batman: City of Lights would score 18 points. 4 points for being an 8 issue limited series, +3 for Batgirl (as she is a main character), +4 for a new villain, +2 for the death of a minor character, and +5 for Batman acting out of character.
- I don’t even want to calculate the score from Hush
With just a little work, this system could be adjusted to fit other super-hero titles as well. Reading Previews will give us enough for Basic SCRUB scores, and reviewers could put Advanced SCRUB scores in their reviews. With the use of SCRUBS, bad Batman storylines can be avoided!
(I admit this is tounge in cheek — mostly — but I still think it could work.)
July 6th, 2004 at 11:34 pm
Scott:
I was right with you until you penalized Batwoman and Bat-Girl appearances. You fiend! At least Bat-Hound escapes without adding any SC.R.U.B.S. points.
H
July 8th, 2004 at 8:38 am
Agreed on the flagrant anti-Batwoman bias. For shame! Of course, I’m dying to score “Hush,” but that would involve skimming them again.
July 8th, 2004 at 3:11 pm
Huh, after reading City of Light, I see that it bucked your system. That series was easily one of the worst Bat stories in the last few years and it only got an 18 on your system. *shrug* nothing is perfect, though.
July 8th, 2004 at 9:07 pm
All in good fun. The DC Comics Present: Batman scored good and low, despite 2 Batmans and a number of villains, one new. Nice system.
July 8th, 2004 at 11:05 pm
But that’s the beauty of the system, with SC.R.U.B.S. you can adjust the modifiers to reflect your own tastes!!
H and David: Reduce the Batwoman penalty to +3, making her equivalent to Batgirl (Barbara Gordon); or to +2, making her the equivalent of Nightwing.
Rick: Add this modifier to the Advanced SC.R.U.B.S. list:
Penciled by artist/artists whose best work was in Grendel (+10)
July 9th, 2004 at 5:26 am
“+6 points if any other JLA member is involved.”
Is that +6 per character, or just +6 if one or more characters are involved?
July 9th, 2004 at 10:35 am
6 points per character, so Green Lantern, Aquaman, and Flash would be +18.
July 9th, 2004 at 11:18 am
I was going to calculate the SCRUBS rating for DK2, but at +6 per character it must be somewhere far above 50.
July 9th, 2004 at 3:38 pm
I still bet HUSH is higher.
Maybe I should add a “may not be compatible with Elseworlds”, but I’m not sure DK2 is actually an Elseworlds
September 10th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
um. not sure i understand the scoring on the sidekicks. how do you differentiate a characted being “involved” vs “half the storyline”? why is one higher than the other?
do you still use this rating system?
November 21st, 2008 at 3:09 am
When I saw the acronym, I initially thought it stood for Screwy Crazy Ridiculous Unbearably Bad Science.
Leave a Reply
Contact Me
About
Subscribe:
The Best Of...
Special Topics
Archives
Categories
Twitter
Comic Blogs
Medical Blogs
Currently Reading
Arbitrarily Interesting Medical Condition
The Net:
Contents may have settled during shipping. Past results are no guarantee of future performance. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Void where prohibited by law. All rights reserved. Not valid with other offers or specials. Professional driver on a closed track. Your financial institution may impose other fees. All models are over 18 years of age. Employees must wash hands before returning to work. Results not typical. Many suitcases look alike. 18% gratuity added to tables of six or more.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
© 2004-2008 Polite Dissent. Powered by WordPress